Planning a
Program Evaluation: Worksheet
Steps in Program
Evaluation
Manage
the evaluation
§ Human Subjects Protection
§ Timeline
§ Responsibilities
§ Budget
|
|
1.
Engage stakeholders |
|||
|
|
|
|
||
2.
Focus |
|
|
|
||
§ Describe program-logic
model
§ Define purpose
§ Determine use/users
§ Determine key questions
§ Select indicators
§ Determine design
|
3.
Collect data |
|
|
||
§ Identify sources
§ Select method(s)
§ Pilot test
§ Set schedule
§ Determine sample
|
4.
Analyze & interpret |
|
|||
§ Process data
§ Analyze
§ Interpret data
§ What did you learn?
§ What are the limitations?
|
5.
Use |
||||
§ Share findings and
lessons learned
§ Use in decision making
§ Determine next steps
|
|||||
|
|||||
Standards
of evaluation:
· Utility · Feasibility · Propriety ·Accuracy |
Who should be
involved?
School Administration; Teachers; Students
|
How
might they be engaged?
Focus
Groups; Information Sessions; Surveys; e-mail communication
|
What are you going to
evaluate? Describe program (logic
model).
The
evaluation will focus on input factors such as who has invested in the
Outdoor Education program in terms of money, equipment, research, and training. The outputs include group work,
presentations, trips, Leadership classes, and Projects students are engaged
in throughout the term. Along with
these student outputs, there will be some analysis of Parent / Guardian
investment and what their desired outcomes might be for their student. The
outcomes of the Outdoor Education Program will be examined based on what
results or changes occurred for the individuals, groups, or the community as
a result of being involved in the Outdoor Education Program. More specifically, the social, economic,
civic, and environmental outcomes will be examined. External factors such as the weather play a
critical role in the delivery of this program and can adversely affect the
input, output, and outcomes. As well,
the desire to continue offering this program is an external factor at play. The primary assumption for the Outdoor
Education Program is that students will learn in the best environment
possible.
|
What
is the purpose of the evaluation?
To
determine the effectiveness of an Outdoor Education Program as a vehicle to
teach in the best environment possible in order to develop lifelong learning
in which the curriculum is taught with a focus on social justice and an understanding of the interconnectedness of
humans to their environment while developing relationships of all program
participants.
|
Who will use the
evaluation? How will they use it?
Who/users
|
How
will they use the information?
|
School
Administrators
|
Increase
enrollment; effective programming
|
Teachers
|
Community
Partnerships; benefits to students
|
Students
|
Realize
potential; pride in accomplishments
|
What
questions will the evaluation seek to answer?
1.
Is learning happening in the best environment possible?
|
2.
Is the curriculum being delivered in 5 key areas?
|
3.
What lifelong learning opportunities are being fostered?
|
What information do
you need to answer the questions?
What
I wish to know
|
Indicators
– How will I know it?
|
Best
Environment?
|
5
Outdoor Trips
|
Curricular
Connections?
|
Examine
courses based on outcomes
|
Lifelong
Learning?
|
Community
connections
|
|
|
When
is the evaluation needed?
2014
– 15 school year
|
What
evaluation design will you use?
Logic
Model
|
Collect the information
What sources of information will you use?
Existing information:
|
Course
Registration Handbook for MMGCI; website
|
People:
|
Erin
McVittie and Mitch Lowe (program teachers); students
|
Pictorial records and observations:
|
Sask
Ed Curriculum; observation; surveys; focus group
|
What data collection
method(s) will you use?
ü
|
Survey
|
ü
|
Document review
|
ü
|
Interview
|
ü
|
Testimonials
|
ü
|
Observation
|
ü
|
Expert panel
|
|
Group techniques
|
|
Simulated problems or
situations
|
|
Case study
|
|
Journal, log, diary
|
|
Tests
|
|
Unobtrusive measures
|
|
Photos, videos
|
|
Other (list)
|
Instrumentation: What
is needed to record the information?
Laptop
|
|
When will you collect
data for each method you’ve chosen?
Method
|
Before
program
|
During
program
|
Immediately
after
|
Later
|
Interview
|
|
ü
|
|
|
Observation
|
|
ü
|
|
|
Document
Review
|
|
ü
|
|
|
Will a sample be used?
No
|
ü
|
|
Yes
|
|
If
yes, describe the procedure you will use.
|
|
Pilot
testing: when, where, how?
|
Analyze and Interpret
How will the data be
analyzed?
Data analysis methods:
|
Data
analysis will be based on the learning outcomes of the program
|
Who responsible:
|
Evaluator
|
How will the information be
interpreted—by whom?
The
information will be shared with program teachers and school administrators by
the program evaluator.
|
|
What did you learn? What are
the limitations?
The
limitations include time, location students are learning, and comfort level
of program participants to share information.
|
|
Use the
Information
How will the evaluation be
communicated and shared?
To whom
|
When/where/how to
present
|
School
Administration
|
Teacher
Learning Group time; informal discussion; formal report
|
Program
Teachers
|
Before
or after school; informal discussion; formal report
|
Students
|
Focus
group
|
|
|
Next
steps?
|
ü
|
Human subject’s protection
|
ü
|
Utility
|
ü
|
Management chart
|
ü
|
Feasibility
|
ü
|
Timeline
|
ü
|
Propriety
|
ü
|
Responsibilities
|
ü
|
Accuracy
|
ü
|
Budget
|
|
|
Hi Coreen
ReplyDeleteYou begin with thorough information in the first few sections but there is detail lacking as you move towards the end. I am interested in seeing more on data analysis, interpretation and next steps. Also please ensure that you share details of how you will attend to managing the evaluation and ensuring the standards of evaluation are being met.
Jay